student
student
student
. In modern realities, the trend of patent infringement on the territory of the Russian Federation is relevant. There is a conflict of interest within the Federal Intellectual Property Service – Rospatent and its structural unit, the Chamber for Patent Disputes. The purpose of this scientific study is to determine the expediency of the existence of the Patent Dispute Chamber as a pre-trial instance for conflict resolution in the patent protection system. To date, there are two approaches to solving this problem, one side insists that it is necessary to abolish the Chamber for Patent Disputes. Others believe that it should be made an independent link, independent of the head of the department and excluded from the structural unit of Rospatent. Based on the analysis of domestic legislation and judicial practice of the Presidium of the Intellectual Property Rights Court, a number of conclusions were drawn to improve the regulation of pre-trial conflict resolution in the field of patent law. In order to improve the regulation of disputes related to the work of Rospatent, it is proposed to separate the Patent Dispute Chamber from the state body represented by Rospatent and transfer control over its activities to an independent instance of the Intellectual Property Rights Court.
Patent law; patent; Rospatent; Intellectual Property Rights Court; disputes on challenging decisions of state bodies
1. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii: feder. zakon ot 30.11.1994 №51-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. – 1994. – №32. – St.3301.
2. Arbitrazhnyy processual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 24.07.2002 № 95-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 29.07.2002. – № 30. – St. 3012.
3. O primenenii Arbitrazhnogo processual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii pri rassmotrenii del v arbitrazhnom sude apellyacionnoy instancii: postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 30 iyunya 2020 g. №12 // ros. gazeta. 17.07.2020. – №156.
4. O poryadke rassmotreniya obrascheniy grazhdan RF: federal'nyy Zakon №59 ot 02.05.2006 (red. ot 04.08.2023) // sobr. zakonodatel'stva RF. 08.05.2006. – №19, – St. 2060.
5. Ob utverzhdenii pravil rassmotreniya i razresheniya federal'nym organom ispolnitel'noy vlasti po intellektual'noy sobstvennosti sporov v administrativnom poryadke: prikaz Minobrnauki Rossii № 644, Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii № 261 ot 30.04.2020 (red. ot 23.11.2022) // oficial'nyy internet-portal pravovoy informacii http://www.pravo.gov.ru.
6. Anischenko V. Rospatent i ego "a certamen interest"(konflikt interesov) / V. Anischenko // Intellektual'naya sobstvennost'. Promyshlennaya sobstvennost'. – 2019. – № 9. – S. 28-32.
7. Voroncova E. S. Sroki rassmotreniya del v palate po patentnym sporam: prepyatstvie na puti k pravosudiyu / E. S. Voroncova, S. S. Semerkov // Integraciya nauk. – 2019. – № 1(24). – S. 236-237.
8. Zalesov, A.V. Nekotorye aspekty razvitiya rossiyskogo patentnogo prava. 2013-2023 gody / A.V. Zalesov // Zhurnal Suda po intellektual'nym pravam. – 2023. – № 2 (40). – S. 166-172.
9. Krysanova N.V. Zaschita intellektual'nyh prav: zakonodatel'nye oshibki pri opredelenii statusa i kompetencii specializirovannyh organov, razreshayuschih dela v sfere promyshlennoy sobstvennosti / N.V. Krysanova, M.A. Rozhkova // Social'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Ser. 4, Gosudarstvo i pravo: Referativnyy zhurnal. – 2017. – №2. – S. 84-86.
10. Klypin A.V. Patentnyy analiz i gosudarstvennaya nauchno-tehnicheskaya politika v sfere intellektual'noy sobstvennosti / A.V. Klypin, S.S. V'yunov // Upravlenie naukoy i naukometriya. – 2020. –№2. – S. 136-171.
11. Mescheryakov V.A. Primenenie ponyatiya «tehnicheskiy rezul'tat» v otechestvennom patentnom prave / V.A. Mescheryakov // Patentnyy poverennyy. – 2021. – № 2. – S. 8.
12. Pereverzev A. V. Nekotorye voprosy osparivaniya resheniy gosudarstvennyh organov v sude po intellektual'nym pravam Rossiyskoy Federacii / A. V. Pereverzev // Innovacii. Nauka. Obrazovanie. – 2020. – № 14. – S. 198-207.
13. Rusanov M. A. Kvazisudebnye organy administrativnoy yusticii / M. A. Rusanov // Publichno-pravovye mehanizmy v obespechenii obschestvennogo razvitiya: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, posvyaschennoy pamyati professora Niny Antonovny Kufakovoy / Rossiyskiy universitet druzhby narodov. – Moskva: Rossiyskiy universitet druzhby narodov (RUDN), – 2017. – S. 235-243.
14. Sorokin I.S. Osobennosti klassifikacii ob'ektov grazhdanskih prav v usloviyah reformirovaniya grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva / I.S. Sorokin // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2019. – № 4. – S. 57.
15. Tarasova M. I. Problemy razvitiya i sposoby stimulirovaniya patentnoy aktivnosti rossiyskih organizaciy / M.I. Tarasova, I.S. Smirnov, M.V. Marhgeym // Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki. – 2020. – №4. – S. 92-97.
