employee from 01.01.2013 to 01.01.2025
Khabarovsk, Khabarovsk, Russian Federation
The article is devoted to clarification of the conceptual apparatus in the management of Russian-Chinese projects. Cooperation between Russia and China in the implementation of joint projects is being actively developed. One of the factors to increase the efficiency of Russian-Chinese projects is the development of project management standards. Standards containing a common conceptual framework promote effective communication between participants in Russian-Chinese projects. Despite the existence of studies on conceptual design management and standardization contained in international and national standards, the legislation of Russia and China on standardization there is a need to clarify the conceptual apparatus for Russian-Chinese projects, but this question has not been studied enough. Author based on documentary analysis of standards RMBEC, RRINCE2, ISO, IPMA, GB and GOST, as well as the laws of Russia and China on standardization using a logical operation definition of concept specify concepts of project management, standard, project management standardization, Standardization system for the management of Sino-Russian projects. The study is limited to the listed key concepts that are most important for participants in joint projects. The results of the study can be used by the state bodies of the two countries and participants of project teams in the development of standards for management of Russian-Chinese projects. Further research may be directed to building a model of standardization of management of Russian-Chinese projects, clarification of other concepts of project management and development of a standard containing the entire conceptual apparatus of management of Russian-Chinese projects.
project management, Russian-Chinese projects, project management standards, conceptual project management apparatus, standardization of Russian-Chinese project management, system of standardization of Russian-Chinese project management
1. GOST R 56715.5-2015. Nacional'nyy standart Rossiyskoy Federacii. Proektnyy menedzhment. Sistemy proektnogo menedzhmenta. Chast' 5. Terminy i opredeleniya. – [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".
2. ISO 21502:2020. Project, programme and portfolio management — Guidance on project management. – Published (Edition 1, 2020). – [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://www.iso.org.
3. ISO/TR 21506:2018. Project, programme and portfolio management — Vocabulary. – Published (Edition 1, 2018). – [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://www.iso.org.
4. IPMA Individual Competence Baseline (ICB4). – International Project Management Association (IPMA). – [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://ipma.world.
5. PRINCE2. – [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://www.prince2.com.
6. 国家市场监督管理总局 国家标准化管理委员会. 国家标准全文公开系统 [Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie po rynochnomu regulirovaniyu KNR, Upravlenie po standartizacii KNR. Sistema publikacii nacional'nyh standartov]. – [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://openstd.samr.gov.cn.
7. Volodin V. V., Dmitriev A. G., Habarov V. I. Osnovnye koncepcii standartizacii upravleniya proektami // Internet-zhurnal «Naukovedenie». – 2015. – T. 7, № 2. – S. 1–16. – URL: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/96EVN215.pdf. – DOI:https://doi.org/10.15862/96EVN215.
8. Il'ina O. N., Polyakova M. A. Sravnitel'nyy analiz standartov v oblasti upravleniya proektami // Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya. – 2015. – № 12. – [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sravnitelnyy-analiz-standartov-v-oblasti-upravleniya-proektami.
9. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition. – Pennsylvania, USA: Project Management Institute, 2021. – 374 p.
10. Cipes G. L. O standartizacii upravleniya proektami, programmami i portfelyami proektov // Standarty i kachestvo. – 2014. – № 6. – [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://www.stquality.ru/files/2014/2014_6_054.pdf.
11. Shapiro V. D. Evolyuciya ponyatiynogo apparata upravleniya proektami // Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya. – 2010. – № 4.
12. Aubry M., Hobbs B. A Fresh Look at the Contribution of Project Management to Organizational Performance // Project Management Journal. – 2011. – Vol. 42, No. 1. – [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pmj.20213.
13. Flyvbjerg B. Over Budget, Over Time, Over and Over Again: The Major IT Projects // Harvard Business Review. – 2011. – [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://hbr.org/2011/05/over-budget-over-time-over-and-over.
14. Turner R., Keegan A. Mechanisms of Governance in the Project-Based Organization: Roles of the Broker and Steward // European Management Journal. – 2001. – Vol. 19, No. 3. – [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0263237300000713.
