employee
This research article examines the transformation of the theoretical concept of sustainable development into specific regional strategies for rural areas of the Russian Federation. Tracing the evolution of this concept from its philosophical and economic origins to its current institutional formulation in key international and national documents, it pays particular attention to the adaptation of sustainability principles in the works of leading Russian scholars, who emphasize the need to balance economic growth, social stability, and environmental safety. The practice-oriented section of the paper analyzes the key challenges and specifics of implementing sustainable development principles in Russia's regional policy, revealing significant differences between the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in their attitudes toward mechanisms for integrating sustainability principles into comprehensive regional development strategies, the results obtained, and the challenges they face. Key institutional barriers encountered during the practical implementation of the sustainable development concept by Russian constituent entities include weak interdepartmental coordination, a shortage of monitoring tools adapted to local conditions, and the inertia of a paradigm that primarily evaluates rural development success based on economic indicators. The final section of the article outlines promising areas for integrating sustainable development goals into regional governance, including (1) the use of digital technologies for predictive modeling, (2) the development of interregional network alliances to address interregional and cross-border issues, (3) a focus on the green and circular economy, and (4) the active involvement of civil society and business in strategic planning processes. The final conclusion is a verified thesis that, despite existing challenges, sustainable development has ceased to be a purely theoretical construct and is becoming a practical guideline for the formation of a balanced and long-term regional policy in Russia.
sustainable development, rural areas, regional strategies, environmental safety, social stability, economic growth, regional policy
1. Andrianov V. D. Konceptual'nye podhody k razrabotke strategii ustoychivogo razvitiya ekonomiki Rossii do 2030 goda // Obschestvo i ekonomika. 2016. № 7. R. 5-35.
2. Balashova E. S., Sharipova S. R. Genezis teoreticheskih predstavleniy ob ustoychivom razvitii social'no-ekonomicheskih sistem // Vestnik permskogo universiteta. Ekonomika. 2019. № 3. S. 371-387.
3. Nashe obschee buduschee: Doklad Mezhdunarodnoy komissii po okruzhayuschey srede i razvitiyu (MKOSR): Per. s angl./Pod red. i s poslesl. S. A. Evteeva i R. A. Pereleta.– M.:Progress, 1989.
4. Biryukov A. N., Akchurina A. M. Analiz kriteriev ocenki regional'noy ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti s uchetom indikatorov investicionnoy sostavlyayuschey // Ekonomika i upravlenie: nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal. 2024. № 4. S. 64-72.
5. Ustoychivoe razvitie: Novye vyzovy: Uchebnik dlya vuzov. Pod obsch. red. V. I. Danilova-Danil'yana, N. A. Piskulovoy. – M.: Izdatel'stvo «AspektPress», 2015. 336 s.
6. Danilov-Danil'yan, V. I. Ekologicheskiy vyzov i ustoychivoe razvitie – Moskva: Progress-Tradiciya, 2000. 414 s.
7. Kadomceva M. E. Koncepciya ustoychivogo razvitiya: evolyuciya teoreticheskih podhodov i sovremennoe videnie // AlterEconomics. 2023. № 1. S. 166-188. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kontseptsiya-ustoychivogo-razvitiya-evolyutsiya-teoreticheskih-podhodov-i-sovremennoe-videnie (data obrascheniya: 19.11.2025).
8. Starikova E. A. Sovremennye podhody k traktovke koncepcii ustoychivogo razvitiya // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Ekonomika. 2017. № 1. S. 7-17.
9. Bobylev S. Ustoychivoe razvitie: paradigma dlya buduschego // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2017. T. 61. № 3. – S. 107-113.
10. Konstantinidi H. A., Sorokozherd'ev V. V., Rubin A. G. Global'naya transformaciya i ustoychivost' ekonomiki sovremennoy Rossii (po itogam nauchnoy konferencii) // Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii. 2023. № 1. R.96-101.
11. Passos Neto G. d. M., Alencar L. H., Valdes-Vasquez R. Multiple-Criteria Methods for Assessing Social Sustainability in the Built Environment: A Systematic Review // Sustainability. 2023. № 15. R. 16231.
12. Preobrazovanie nashego mira: Povestka dnya v oblasti ustoychivogo razvitiya na period do 2030 goda. Rezolyuciya, prinyataya General'noy Assambleey 25 sentyabrya 2015 goda. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://docs.un.org/ru/A/RES/70/1 (data obrascheniya: 19.11.2025).
13. Strategiya ustoychivogo razvitiya sel'skih territoriy Rossiyskoy Federacii na period do 2030 goda (utverzhdena rasporyazheniem Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 2 fevralya 2015 goda №151-r) [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://static.government.ru/media/files/Fw1kbNXVJxQ.pdf (data obrascheniya: 19.11.2025).
14. O nacional'nyh celyah razvitiya RF do 2030 goda. Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 21.07.2020 g. № 474. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/45726 (data obrascheniya: 19.11.2025).
15. Ahmed N., Thompson S., Glaser M. Global Aquaculture Productivity, Environmental Sustainability, And Climate Change Adaptability // Environmental Management. 2019. No. 63. R. 159-172.
16. Golovina S. G., Abilova E. V., Golovikhin S. A., Kuznetsova A. R. Innovation as a Factor in Successful Rural Development // BIO Web of Conferences 140. 2024. Vol. 140. R. 03012.
17. Skomoroschenko A. A., Tyupakov V. K. Ustoychivoe razvitie sel'skih territoriy kak prioritetnoe napravlenie razvitiya agrarnogo sektora ekonomiki Krasnodarskogo kraya // Moskovskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. 2025. T. 10, № 2. S. 144-163.
18. Poluyanova N. V., Kireeva N. A., Kublin I. M., Pruschak O. V. Regional'naya social'no-ekonomicheskaya politika i ustoychivoe razvitie: prioritety razvitiya sel'skih territoriy // Ekonomika ustoychivogo razvitiya. 2021. № 4 (48). S. 144-152.
19. Bovkun-Saass M. I. Mehanizmy obespecheniya ustoychivogo razvitiya sel'skih territoriy posredstvom stimulirovaniya razvitiya APK // Vestnik NGIEI. 2025. № 4 (167). S. 71-82.
20. Bahmatova A. K., Sarishvili M. G. Mehanizm dostizheniya celey ustoychivogo razvitiya v Rossii / Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. 2021. № 3. S. 12-16 [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://fundamental-research.ru/ru/article/view?id=42973 (data obrascheniya: 19.03.2025).
21. Dobrokhotov K. O. Impact of Digitalization on Sustainable Development of Rural Areas // Science and Society. 2020. № 2 (37). R. 50.
22. Knickel K., Almeida A., Galli F. (eds). Transitioning Towards a Sustainable Wellbeing Economy – Implications for Rural-Urban Relations // Land. 2021. Vol. 10 (5). P. 512.
23. Ma H.-W., Shih H.-C., Liao M-I. Circular Economy and New Research Directions in Sustainability. In book: Pursuing Sustainability, OR/MS Applications in Sustainable Design, Manufacturing, Logistics, and Resource Management, 2021. R.141-168.
24. Golovina S. G., Ashabaliev I. Ch., Fedorova Zh. V. Potencial teorii social'nyh setey v dostizhenii ustoychivogo razvitiya sel'skih territoriy // Nauchnoe obozrenie. Seriya 1: Ekonomika i pravo. 2024. № 1. S. 190-204.
25. Babaeva Z. Sh. Voprosy investicionnoy privlekatel'nosti otrasley ekonomiki regiona //Journal of Monetary Economics and Management.- 2022. № 3. S.3-8.
