The Pros and Cons of Using AI in Military Decision-Making Systems
Abstract and keywords
Abstract:
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI)-based decision support systems (DSS) into military processes related to the use of force represents one of the most significant and controversial technological shifts in modern conflict. This article analyzes the key provisions of the 2024 expert report by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and the Geneva Academy on this issue. The article aims to structure the discussion around the conceptual differences between AI-based DSS and autonomous weapons systems, identify the main technical, legal, and ethical risks associated with the use of AI in critical decisions, and evaluate proposed measures to preserve meaningful human control. Based on the analysis, it is concluded that the key humanitarian imperative is not a ban on technologies, but the development of strict restrictions, testing protocols, and a “constraints architecture” in human-machine interactions that ensure the primacy of law and human dignity in the context of the digitalization of war.

Keywords:
artificial intelligence, decision support systems, military affairs, international humanitarian law, autonomous weapons, human control, ethics, conflict
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. ICRC and Geneva Academy. Expert Consultation Report on AI and Related Technologies in Military Decision-Making on the Use of Force in Armed Conflicts. Geneva: ICRC, March 2024.

2. International Committee of the Red Cross. “ICRC Position Paper: Artificial intelligence and machine learning in armed conflict: A human-centred approach.” International Review of the Red Cross, March 2021.

3. International Committee of the Red Cross. “ICRC position on autonomous weapon systems.” 12 May 2021.

4. Holland Michel, Arthur. Decisions, Decisions, Decisions: Computation and Artificial Intelligence in Military Decision-Making. ICRC, March 2024.

5. Ekelhof, Merel, and Giacomo Persi Paoli. “The human element in decisions about the use of force.” UNIDIR, March 2020.

6. Boulanin, V., and M. Verbruggen. “Mapping the Development of Autonomy in Weapon Systems.” SIPRI, 2017.

7. Bogdanova Zh. Sostyazatel'nye ataki (Adversarial Attacks) – chto eto takoe i kak oni obmanyvayut modeli II – Rezhim dostupa: https://dtf.ru/id2687299/4082105-sostyazatelnye-ataki-kak-obmanyvayut-modeli-ii (data obrascheniya 05.12.2025)

8. Vvedenie v Adversarial attacks: kak zaschitit'sya ot atak v modeli glubokogo obucheniya na tranzakcionnyh dannyh – Rezhim dostupa: https://habr.com/ru/companies/vtb/articles/718024/ (data obrascheniya 01.12.2025)

Login or Create
* Forgot password?