In law enforcement activities, there is a wide range of possible ways and means for citizens to protect their interests, which leads to a conflict of claims. The most common way of protection is to appeal to the judicial authorities. In practice, there are situations where the same act can be classified as both a breach of contract and a tort. In such cases, there are questions about which norms to refer to in support of one's claims, and which claim to file to protect one's violated rights. This presents a challenge for parties, as it leads to different procedural outcomes in cases involving damages. Therefore, it is crucial to carefully analyze the circumstances of each case and choose the appropriate type of claim to ensure the most effective and fair compensation for damages.
contract, losses, harm, claim, civil liability
1. Osnovnye polozheniya grazhdanskogo prava : Postateynyy kommentariy k stat'yam 1–16.1 GK RF / A. V. Asoskov, V. V. Baybak, R. S. Bevzenko [i dr.]. Moskva: Obschestvo s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu «M–LOGOS». 2020. S. 312.
2. Dogovornoe i obyazatel'stvennoe pravo (obschaya chast') : Postateynyy kommentariy k stat'yam 307–453 GK RF / V. V. Baybak, R. S. Bevzenko, O. A. Belyaeva [i dr.]. Moskva: Obschestvo s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu «M–LOGOS». 2017. S 174.
3. Postanovlenie Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 03.06.2014 № 2410/14 po delu № A41–2321/13 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
4. Opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ekonomicheskim sporam Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 02.09.2016 № 305–ES16–10782 po delu № A40–60569/2015 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
5. Kryukova M. A. Ugroza neosnovatel'nogo obogascheniya istca kak osnovanie otkaza v iske // Zhurnal «Zakon». 2018. № 4. S. 179.
6. Tololaeva N. V. Passivnye solidarnye obyazatel'stva: rossiyskiy podhod i kontinental'no–evropeyskaya tradiciya: monografiya. Moskva: Statut. 2020. S. 63.
7. Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 20.12.2018 № F05–21470/2018 po delu № A40–242439/2017 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
8. Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Severo–Zapadnogo okruga ot 26.09.2018 № F07–10530/2018 po delu № A66–19843/2017 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
9. Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Volgo–Vyatskogo okruga ot 05.08.2014 po delu № A82–7538/2012 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
10. Chaykina A. V. Izmenenie poryadka i sposoba ispolneniya sudebnogo resheniya v kontekste konkurencii iskov // Vestnik grazhdanskogo processa. 2022. № 5. S. 197.
11. Zakon RF ot 07.02.1992 № 2300–1 (red. ot 04.08.2023) «O zaschite prav potrebiteley» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 1996. № 3. St. 140.
12. Opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po grazhdanskim delam Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 15.11.2022 № 16–KG22–27–K4 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
