employee from 01.01.2014 to 01.01.2025
The study of the conditions for global economic development related to the experience of globalization has shown that, against the backdrop of established links between national economies, one of the main sources of growth today is intensification aimed at increasing the efficiency of production activities, labor productivity, and innovative activity. It has been shown that the globalization processes of the world economy in the 21st century were largely based on the rapid development of science and technology, given that the spread of the market economic system was based on the growing cross-border division of labor, which penetrates to the level of production chains in enterprises in different countries. It is argued that the established advantages of economic globalization and the intensification of the global economy are primarily used by developed countries, while developing countries have not been fully included in this process and have not used their comparative advantages. Nevertheless, even with the introduction of advanced technologies and the inflow of foreign capital, the ongoing process of globalization poses enormous risks for developing countries. New opportunities for growth and rates of change in different countries have been identified, which are linked to infrastructure development in the context of rethinking globalization and the new normal. It has been established that, despite some positive changes, conditions for successful intensive development have not been established in Russia, and it is necessary to strengthen regulatory measures by state authorities to support knowledge-intensive industries, develop research and development activities, and expand the use of cluster initiatives.
globalization, cross-country capital flows, cross-border trade, innovation, technologies
1. Amosha A.I. Intensifikaciya ekonomiki v usloviyah formirovaniya razvityh rynochnyh otnosheniy // Nacional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost'. 2010. № 16. S. 72-76.
2. Vaganova O.V. Povyshenie effektivnosti upravleniya innovacionnym proizvodstvom s ispol'zovaniem elementov intensifikacii // Vestnik VolGU. Seriya 10: Innovacionnaya deyatel'nost'. 2011. № 5. S. 57-61.
3. Volchkov V.N. Proizvoditel'nost' truda kak klyuchevoy faktor intensifikacii ekonomiki // Krymskiy nauchnyy vestnik. 2015. № 5-1. S. 191-196.
4. Dronova O.B., Kozlova Zh.M. Sostoyanie i tendencii razvitiya zarubezhnyh transnacional'nyh korporaciy // Ekonomicheskie otnosheniya. 2019. Tom 9. № 2. S. 573-588.
5. Kardapol'cev A.O. Innovacionnyy potencial Rossiyskoy ekonomiki // Aktual'nye problemy aviacii i kosmonavtiki. 2016. №12. S.265-267.
6. Kondrat'ev V.B. Konec globalizacii ili novyy etap? // Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya. 2017. №12. S. 6-17.
7. Konovalova Yu.A., Alekseeva N.A. Faktory i pokazateli intensifikacii proizvodstva // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya «Ekonomika i pravo». 2011. № 1. S.8-12.
8. Kuznecova S. Yu. Formirovanie strategicheskih al'yansov kompaniy v usloviyah intensifikacii razvitiya real'nogo sektora ekonomiki // PSE. 2011. № 4. S. 129-132.
9. Luk'yanova A.V., Klepikov D.N. Nacional'nye problemy promyshlennogo sektora ekonomiki // Uspehi v himii i himicheskoy tehnologii. 2015. № 5 (164). S. 61-63.
10. Pavlov K.V. Analiz i ispol'zovanie investiciy i innovaciy intensivnogo i ekstensivnogo tipa v Rossii // Vestnik Instituta ekonomicheskih issledovaniy. 2016. № 3 (3). S. 5-13.
11. Pavlov K.V., Mitrofanova I.V. Ocenka ekonomicheskoy effektivnosti intensifikacii regional'nogo proizvodstvennogo kompleksa: novye podhody // Ekonomika i ekologicheskiy menedzhment. 2016. № 2. S. 24-37.
12. Prigoda L.V., Kiseleva V.A. Problemy, sderzhivayuschie rost proizvoditel'nosti truda // Novye tehnologii. 2015. № 4. S. 122-129.
13. Sapegina O.P. Klastery kak iniciatory innovacionnyh processov v ekonomike regiona // Teoriya i praktika obschestvennogo razvitiya. 2014. № 4. S. 193-195.
14. Soldatikova N.I. Innovacii kak faktor obespecheniya ustoychivogo ekonomicheskogo rosta // Vestnik ChelGU. 2015. № 8 (363). S. 63-70.
15. Solov'eva O.A. Smozhet li Rossiya vstat' na rel'sy intensivnogo puti ekonomicheskogo razvitiya? // PSE. 2015. № 2 (54). S. 117-120.
16. Harrod R.K. Teorii ekonomicheskoy dinamiki. Novye vyvody ekonomicheskoy teorii i ih primenenie v ekonomicheskoy politike / Klassiki keynsianstva: v 2-h t. M.: Ekonomika, 1997. T.1, S. 39-194.
17. Hlynin E.V. Obespechenie ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti real'nogo sektora ekonomiki v rezul'tate intensifikaciya processa vosproizvodstva osnovnogo kapitala // Izvestiya TulGU. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. 2016. № 4-1. S. 278-286.
18. European Central Bank (2015). Understanding the Weakness in World Trade // Economic Bulletin. Vol. 3. Pp. 33-42.
19. Baldwin R. (2011). Trade and Industrialization after Globalization, 2nd Unbundling: How Building and Joining a Supply Chain are Different and Why It Matters. NBER, Cambridge, MA. — Working Paper, No. 17716.
20. Drucker P. (1969). The Age of Discontinuity. London, Heinemann. 370 p.
21. IMF (2023). Geoeconomic Fragmentation and the Future of Multilateralism. SDN/ 2023/001. ISBN 979-8-40022-904-6. URL: https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/sdn/2023/english/sdnea2023001.pdf (accessed 21.10.2025).
22. Mittelman J.H. (1996). Rethinking the "New Regionalism" in the Context of Globalization. Global Governance. Vol. 2. Pp. 189-213.
23. OECD (2017). OECD Data Explorer. URL: http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=PDB_LV (accessed 20.10.2025).
24. Saeger S. (1997). Globalization and de-industrialization: Myth and reality in the OECD. Weltwirshaftliches Archiv. Vol. 133 (4). Pp. 579-607.
25. UNCTAD (2026). Global trade update. URL: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ditcinf2025d11_en.pdf (data obrascheniya: 18.10.2025).
26. WTO (2023). World Trade Report 2023. ISBN 978-92-870-7410-2. URL: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/wtr23_e/wtr23_e.pdf (accessed 21.10.2025).
