graduate student
The presented scientific article discusses methodological approaches to assessing the balance of regional development. The article raises the problem of uneven development of regions, which can lead to economic, social and environmental problems. The need to achieve balanced spatial development is emphasized in order to ensure the sustainable development of the country as a whole. The author examines and analyzes various approaches to assessing balance, such as: statistical methods: analysis of socio-economic indicators (GRP, income, unemployment, investment, etc.) and their differentiation between regions; index methods: building complex indices based on a set of indicators characterizing various aspects of development (economic, social, ecological); econometric modeling: the use of models to identify factors affecting the balance of spatial development and predict its dynamics. The advantages and disadvantages of the approaches of various authors to the assessment of spatial balance are noted. In conclusion, it is concluded that despite a large number of studies in this area, there is currently no methodology for a comprehensive dynamic assessment of the spatial development of regions that meets modern challenges and realities of an economic, environmental, and geopolitical nature.
region, spatial development, balance, assessment methodology, indicators, indexes
1. Animica E.G. Evolyucionnye izmeneniya v otechestvennoy regional'noy ekonomike // Razvitie paradigmal'nyh idey v otechestvennoy regional'noy ekonomike. – Ekaterinburg: UrGEU, 2022. – S. 17.
2. Granberg A.G. Ekonomicheskoe prostranstvo Rossii: transformacii na rubezhe vekov i al'ternativy buduschego (chast' vtoraya) // Obschestvo i ekonomika. – 1999. – №5. – S. 49-65.
3. Animica E.G., Surnina N.M. Ekonomicheskoe prostranstvo Rossii: problemy i perspektivy // Ekonomika regiona. – 2006. – №3. – S. 34-46.
4. Minakir P.A. Rossiyskoe ekonomicheskoe prostranstvo: strategicheskie tupiki // Ekonomika regiona. – 2019. – T.15, №4. – S. 967-980.
5. Gagarina G.Yu., Mudrova S.V. Metodologiya razvitiya kategorii ekonomicheskogo prostranstva kak predmetnoy oblasti hozyaystvennyh processov // Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki. – 2021. – №4(80). – S. 134-136.
6. Kompleksnye prostranstvennye issledovaniya: monografiya / A.A. Adamesku, N.N. Miheeva, I.V. Grishina i dr. – M.: VAVT, 2019. – 371 s.
7. Granberg A.G. Ekonomicheskoe prostranstvo Rossii: transformacii na rubezhe vekov i al'ternativy buduschego // Obschestvo i ekonomika. – 1999. – №3-4. – S. 225-244.
8. Mirohina A.A. Monitoring anomaliy v razvitii ekonomicheskogo prostranstva: predposylki, koncepciya, instrumentariy // Kant. – 2018. – № 4 (29). – S. 324-329.
9. Suvorova A.V. Osobennosti ocenki prostranstvennyh faktorov razvitiya ekonomiki regiona // Rossiyskie regiony v fokuse peremen: Sbornik dokladov XIV Mezhdunarodnoy konferencii, Ekaterinburg, 14–16 noyabrya 2019 goda. Ekaterinburg: OOO «Izdatel'stvo UMC UPI», 2020. S. 608-610.
10. Ekspert Edinogo instituta vystupil na konferencii po voprosam razvitiya territoriy / Edinyy institut prostranstvennogo razvitiya. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://eipp.ru/news/2023 (Data obrascheniya 14.10.2024).
11. Chernyshov M.M. Integral'naya ocenka investicionnoy sostavlyayuschey effektivnosti prostranstvennogo razvitiya makroregionov Rossiyskoy Federacii // Regional'nye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki. – 2021. – № 10. – S. 101–114. Doi: https://doi.org/10.26726/1812-7096-2021-10-101-114.
12. Avramchikova N.T., Chuvashova M.N. Instrumenty ocenki kachestva ekonomicheskogo prostranstva resursno-orientirovannogo regiona // Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika. – 2015. – № 28 (403). – S. 29-39.
13. Mihaylichenko M.Yu. Metodika ocenki sbalansirovannogo prostranstvennogo razvitiya regiona. // Ekonomika. Informatika. – 2024. – 51(2). S. 296–308. Doihttps://doi.org/10.52575/2687- 0932-2024-51-2-296-308
14. Proskurnova K.Yu. Instrumenty ocenki prostranstvennogo razvitiya regionov // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 21. Upravlenie (gosudarstvo i obschestvo). – 2024. – T. 21. № 1. – C. 121-138. Doi:https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2073-2643-21-2024-1-121-138.
