student
Russian Federation
This article provides a historical and institutional analysis of the evolution of government regulation and self-regulation mechanisms in the Russian construction industry during a period of market transformation. The study aims to identify contradictions between theoretical recommendations for organizing self-regulatory organizations (SROs) and practical legislative decisions, as well as to propose tools for improving the effectiveness of industry oversight. The methodological framework utilizes a systems analysis of the regulatory framework, the theory of institutional change and agency relationships, as well as statistical and reporting data from SROs. The study demonstrates that the introduction of mandatory self-regulation under Federal Laws 315-FZ and 372-FZ has reduced bureaucratic barriers. However, a number of organizations experience a shortage of resource and methodological support, and feedback mechanisms with the regulator remain underdeveloped. The analysis identifies key issues such as the transparency of SRO financial transactions, inconsistency in membership procedures, and the lack of end-to-end digital solutions. Measures are proposed to develop a unified digital data exchange platform, standardize professional risk assessment methods, strengthen the audit of guarantee funds, and introduce a rating system for SROs. The implementation of these tools is intended to optimize interactions between the government and the professional community, improve the quality of construction work, and strengthen the trust of market participants.
public policy, self-regulation, construction activities, self-regulatory organization, legal regulation
1. Voronova E. G. Osobennosti sovershenstvovaniya institucional'noy infrastruktury samoregulirovaniya v stroitel'stve // Vestnik mirovoy nauki. 2018. T. 10. № 5. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36768632 (data obrascheniya: 21.03.2024).
2. Komov R. R. Razvitie sistem i otnosheniy uchastnikov kompleksa inzhenerii v stroitel'stve // Aktual'nye problemy stroitel'stva i obrazovaniya – 2023: Sbornik dokladov IV Nacional'noy nauchnoy konferencii, Moskva, 15 dekabrya 2023 goda. Moskva: Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy stroitel'nyy universitet (nacional'nyy issledovatel'skiy universitet). 2024. S. 948–953.
3. Kozheev V. A., Kozheev M. V., Yud. A. Ocenka konkurentosposobnosti samoreguliruemyh organizaciy v stroitel'stve // Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo. 2023. № 6 (155). S. 1379–1382.
4. Mohov, A. A. Gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie i samoregulirovanie ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti s poziciy teorii sistem / A. A. Mohov // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2019. – № 6. – S. 56-65. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.31857/S013207690005258-5. – EDN HHSGRH.
5. Nikiforova, V. D. Nekotorye aspekty formirovaniya biznes ekosistem i sistemy gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya i samoregulirovaniya ih deyatel'nosti / V. D. Nikiforova, A. A. Nikiforov // Nauchnye trudy Severo-Zapadnogo instituta upravleniya RANHiGS. – 2024. – T. 15, № 4(66). – S. 109-119. – EDN VAVPIU.
6. Sychev, I. V. Stanovlenie instituta samoregulirovaniya v gosudarstvennoy sisteme upravleniya stroitel'nym kompleksom / I. V. Sychev // Refleksiya. – 2021. – № 6. – S. 34-37. – EDN TKXMRP.
7. Cyganov G. V. Formirovanie struktury monitoringa vypolneniya gosudarstvennogo stroitel'nogo zakaza // Moskovskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. 2023. T. 8. № 7. URL: https://ejc.su/ekonomicheskaya-teoriya/moskovskiy-ekonomicheskiy-zhurnal-7-2023/30
8. Cyganov G. Vzaimodeystvie formal'nyh i neformal'nyh institutov rynka: teoreticheskiy i metodologicheskiy aspekty // Teoriya i praktika obschestvennogo razvitiya. 2013. № 9. S. 288–291.
